The SOS Initiative
Trust People, Not Politicians.
Prevent Sprawl Development.
Measure A The SOS Initiative
Prevents Sprawl Development
Stops Backroom Political Deals
Gives a Voice to the People
SOS encourages developers to follow San Diego County’s long-term growth plans instead of convincing politicians to let them skirt the rules to build sprawl housing developments in the wrong places.
The purpose of Measure A, SOS Initiative, is to provide San Diego County residents with a stronger voice in how and where housing is built in the unincorporated county. This grassroots initiative simply requires voter approval of proposed changes to the County’s General Plan that would significantly increase residential density in fire-prone rural and semi-rural areas.
What Your Vote Means on March 3rd, 2020
A YES vote would put massive sprawl development to a vote of the people.
A NO vote would maintain business as usual and allow developers to re-write the County General Plan to benefit themselves.
Prevents Sprawl Development
San Diego County’s General Plan concentrates new housing in areas where roads, public safety, schools, and other services are already available. These locations are easier to defend from wildfire and have a lower taxpayer burden because they don’t require new infrastructure. The General Plan also zones for housing in areas that would limit traffic impacts. Measure A gives voters an opportunity to say “no” to dense developments in rural and semi-rural areas.
Stops Backroom Political Deals
Gives a Voice to the People
Measure A gives people the right to vote on whether they want large sprawl housing developments in San Diego County’s backcountry, a decision now made by politicians and special interests who fund their campaigns. Measure A supports the sensible and orderly growth we have already planned for instead of allowing developers to maximize profits at the public’s expense.
Promotes Smart, Affordable Development
San Diego County’s General Plan allows for the construction of 60,000 new housing units with a broad range of affordability, including apartments and condos, townhouses, and single-family homes. These homes can be built now without any changes to the General Plan or public votes. Projects that provide genuine low income housing in accordance with state law are exempt from the initiative. New housing in areas close to roads and other infrastructure is less expensive to build and therefore more affordable. The SOS initiative does not ban any new housing that is now allowed in the General Plan.
…texts and emails show that it was representatives with the Building Industry Association of San Diego County who approached Desmond, and lawyers for the No on A campaign, which is funded by the building and real estate industry, who not only asked for the item to be put on the agenda, but also crafted the wording which was very similar to what Desmond ended up proposing.
County Supervisor Abandons Effort to Make Developer-Friendly Updates to Official Description of Anti-Sprawl ‘SOS’ Ballot Measure
“The last-minute attempt to change the official description of this community-led ballot measure makes it clear why San Diego County needs the SOS initiative,” said Susan Baldwin, president of San Diegans for Managed Growth and a key campaign volunteer. “Once again, we see an elected member of the Board of Supervisors acting at the behest of the building industry instead of supporting a transparent and democratic process.”
Why won’t developers simply follow the General Plan? The answer is simple: to maximize private profit at the public’s expense. These sprawl developers buy up land that is zoned for agriculture or open space on the cheap and then ask the Board of Supervisors to change the General Plan to allow them to build lots of expensive houses in far-flung parts of the county.
Mayor Paul McNamara joins public officials around the county in endorsing Yes on Measure A, the anti-sprawl measure.
Escondido Mayor Paul McNamara has announced his endorsement of Measure A. Mayor McNamara joins a growing number of elected officials who believe that to grow smartly in the region we need to curb sprawl and build sustainable, livable cities and suburbs.
What You Need to Know About Two Contentious 2020 Housing Measures
Safeguard our San Diego Countryside is a proposal on the March 2020 ballot that would require San Diego voters countywide to approve general plan amendments.
“This measure only applies to general plan amendments. There’s no plan to provide infrastructure for these areas for general plan amendments,” Jackson said. “So Yes on SOS gives voters a voice in few critical land use decisions when the general plan is changed.”
SOS limits urban sprawl
Let’s have a choice on what we taxpayers are paying for!
The Safeguard Our San Diego countryside (Yes on SOS) March 2020 Ballot Measure allows citizens to have a voice on sprawl development.
The General Plan was – and is – the blueprint for how the county will grow into the future. It is the master plan for regional infrastructure (including roads, transit, schools, water and sewer) that saves taxpayers billions by placing housing where these services are funded. It encourages building more than 60,000 new homes in places that are more cost effective and thereby more affordable than sprawl development. That’s about 180,000 people, about 30,000 more than the City of Escondido.
Measure A Would Stop Politicians from Turning San Diego into Los Angeles
The well-funded misinformation campaign against citizen’s initiative Save our San Diego Countryside — now officially Measure A — is being driven and bankrolled by the Building Industry Association and a handful of sprawl developers who repeatedly seek special exemptions to build in the fire-prone areas that our planning regulations avoid. This should tell you all you need to know about their motivations.
Ballot language on development measure will remain unchanged following error
A last-minute attempt by Supervisor Jim Desmond to change the wording of a controversial measure that will appear on the March ballot failed Tuesday without even being considered.
Backers said the move by Desmond to change the language reeked of developer influence and was an example of why the measure should pass in March.
Your say: Ballot box planning and the Save Our San Diego Countryside measure
We asked: With the Safeguard Our San Diego Countryside initiative on the March 2020 ballot, do you think public votes should be held on all major housing developments or should elected leaders make such land-use decisions, and why?
The grassroots “Yes on SOS” campaign has launched its website in support of the Safeguard Our San Diego Countryside ballot initiative, which will appear on the March 2020 ballot.
“Yes on SOS” would give voters power to prioritize sensible growth and affordable homes, increase transparency, reduce sprawl and stop back-room developer deals.
As We Watch California Burn Yet Again It’s Time to Say Yes to ‘Save Our San Diego Countryside’
San Diego County has seen big money defeat similar efforts in the past, but now, as we watch California turn into an inferno once again, perhaps reason will prevail. It’s time we stop our history of insane development, save our countryside, protect the local environment, and not let moneyed interests make the future of our region any more perilous than it already is.
Voters could have final say over massive (and not so massive) backcountry developments
“When you put cities where there are no roads, where there isn’t fire service, there aren’t schools, the cost of the infrastructure is going to be borne by the general taxpayer,” said Mark Jackson, with the Yes on S.O.S. campaign.
Elected Officials & Individuals
I support Measure A because, like Escondido’s Proposition S, it will help preserve the integrity of the consensus-based plan that maps out smart land use planning for a growing region and it will encourage more entry-level, workforce housing in the County.
As a 20 year member of the Board of Supervisors, I was intimately involved in the creation of our award-winning general plan which was designed to save taxpayer money, limit housing in very high fire severity zones and to protect some habitat while encouraging smart planning and land use principles. To see that plan repeatedly being undermined by sprawl developers and speculators who do not have the public’s best interests at heart, is very concerning for the future of our region. This is why I support SOS. It encourages smarter development decisions without allowing special interests to change the plan that the public and other stakeholders spent over a decade and $18 million developing. Vote Yes on SOS.
It is important that the County’s already approved smart growth plans be followed to create a community where open space is preserved and urban sprawl is prevented. The SOS initiative will ensure that our rural areas are protected and growth occurs in the right places — near transit and jobs. I am proud to endorse it.
The Safeguard our San Diego Countryside initiative does a good job of preventing sprawl development, preserving our open spaces, and encouraging county leaders to stick to the general plan they spent millions to develop – a plan that was designed to encourage smart growth and housing affordability. If the SOS initiative is passed, the voters will get to decide whether large housing projects in the San Diego backcountry should be approved. Considering the growing risks of fire, the additional traffic, and the burdens on neighboring cities and schools, it’s not unreasonable to let the voters have a say.
How You Can Help
It takes significant funds to make an initiative come together and to get the word out to the county. Every dollar helps and we’ve made it quick and easy to donate online today.
Follow & Share on Facebook
It only takes a moment to follow us and share our updates on Facebook and can help reach thousands! Click below to follow us now.
Get Out and VOTE!
On March 3, 2020 get out to the polls and vote! Encourage your friends and family to join you. Are you registered? If not click below and register today.